Lea Ma vs Haley Giavara Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 22 May at 08:48 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Ma vs H. Giavara

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Ma 1 - 0 Giavara
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lea Ma winning 2 and Haley Giavara winning 0. The last match between Lea Ma and Haley Giavara was at the W50 Pelham, 22-05-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Lea Ma getting the victory 6-2 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Ma | 1 |
| Giavara | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) W50 Pelham(05-22-25)
L. Ma vs H. Giavara H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 62.66% (99-59) | Career Total W/L | 48.50% (129-137) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Titles | 1 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
L. Ma vs H. Giavara Match Preview:
- Examining second serve performance, Giavara slightly leads with 38.62% compared to Ma’s 38.35%. Could this minor edge influence the match outcome?
- In return games, Giavara shows strength by winning 54.18% of second serve returns, outpacing Ma, who has 48.54% success. Giavara also holds an edge in first serve returns with 35.07% over Ma's 30.23%.
- Both players show resilience under pressure with Ma saving 50.82% of breakpoints compared to Giavara’s 45.65%. How crucial could these defensive capabilities be in tight situations?
- Considering overall performance, Ma surpasses Giavara with a yearly win rate of 64.41% versus 49.21%. Might this consistency dictate the upcoming match?
- When analyzing surface preference, Giavara has a stronger record on Hard with 51%, whereas Ma excels on I.hard with a 64% win rate.
- In terms of competition level, Ma has faced slightly tougher opponents, with an average rank of 386.42, compared to Giavara's 398.33.
- Ma shows a higher deciding set win rate at 50%, compared to Giavara’s 41%. Could this prove decisive if the match goes the distance?
- Break point conversion reveals a close contest, with Ma at 49.37% and Giavara at 48.15%. Which player will capitalize on these opportunities more effectively?
Editorial Prediction (May 22, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming matchup showcases two players with contrasting strengths. Giavara demonstrates superior return game effectiveness, which could disrupt Ma's serve game. Meanwhile, Ma’s higher breakpoint defense and consistent match win percentage hint at greater resilience.
Evaluating their respective competition levels reinforces Ma's experience against slightly stronger opponents, potentially offering an edge in high-pressure moments. Further supporting Ma's case is their robust deciding set record, suggesting the ability to close out tightly contested matches.
Although both players exhibit competitive break point conversion rates, Ma’s stronger overall performance and adaptability on hard surfaces make them a formidable opponent for Giavara. Taking these factors into account, Ma appears to have a slight advantage in securing the win.
In conclusion, while Giavara has notable strengths, Ma’s consistency and defensive capabilities may be key to triumphing in this clash.
Lea Ma vs Haley Giavara Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Ma vs H. Giavara H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 3 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:12:34 | Average Match Time | 1:12:34 |
| 44% (16/36) | 1st Serve % | 63% (43/68) |
| 81% (13/16) | 1st Serve Win % | 49% (21/43) |
| 65% (13/20) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (12/25) |
| 38% (5/13) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
| 51% (35/68) | Return Points Win % | 28% (10/36) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Ma Recent Matches Played
H. Giavara Recent Matches Played

L. Ma vs H. Giavara Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.66% (99/59) | YTD Win/Loss | 48.50% (129/137) |
| 62.11% (218/133) | Sets Win/Loss | 49.17% (295/305) |
| 55.85% (1770/1399) | Games Win/Loss | 49.89% (2704/2716) |
| 64.22% (70/39) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.83% (92/89) |
| 59.46% (22/15) | Clay Win/Loss | 44.12% (30/38) |
| 63.64% (7/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 38.46% (5/8) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 50.00% (2/2) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.08 |
| 398 | Aces Total | 217 |
| 0.19 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.35 |
| 295 | Total Double Faults | 928 |
| 1:33:38 | Average Match Time | 1:25:8 |
| 435.56 | Average Opponent Rank | 437.39 |
| 58% (5275/9066) | 1st Serve % | 65% (10444/16175) |
| 65% (3442/5275) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (6190/10444) |
| 48% (1831/3790) | 2nd Serve Win % | 45% (2560/5731) |
| 50% (608/1226) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (935/2057) |
| 47% (4503/9598) | Return Points Win % | 45% (7332/16145) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 63.16% (96/56) | Challenger W/L | 45.74% (86/102) |
| 60.00% (3/2) | Futures W/L | 58.90% (43/30) |
| 66% (99/149) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 48% (126/262) |
| 0% (0/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 54% (14/26) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 40% (18/45) |
| 57% (23/40) | Deciding Set Win % | 44% (32/72) |
| 87% (106/92) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (140/116) |
| 12% (106/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 16% (140/23) |
| 15% (52/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (126/12) |